Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 10/02/2014 - 05:30
Lien Stripping in Chapter 7 Last week, the 11th Circuit issued two back-to-back ("not for publication") decisions in In re Phillip, 2014 WL 4802758 (11th Cir. Sept. 29, 2014) and In re Vaner Iest, 2014 WL 4825253 (11th Cir. Sept. 30, 2014). The mortgage lender in both cases was Bank of America, N.A.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 09/24/2014 - 19:53
"Post hoc ergo propter hoc" - Latin for the fallacy of reasoning of "after this, therefore because of this." President Bartlet in this episode from West Wing challenged the 27 lawyers in the room that at lease one of them should know the m
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 09/17/2014 - 16:57
"The recent Middle District of Florida decision in In re Nabavi, 2014 WL 3939595 (D.C. M.D. Florida, August 12, 2014) made reference to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal’s longtime adoption of the "civil plain error rule" - an exception to the general rule that an appellate court will not consider an issue not raised in the lower court. In the Nabavi appeal to the District Court from the Bankruptcy Court, the creditor raised arguments which it had failed to bring before the Bankruptcy Court.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/15/2014 - 17:46
An indictment was filed a few days ago against former chapter 7 debtors in Palm Beach County. It provides an occasion to review the bankruptcy crimes provisions of title 18 of the United States Code.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 09/14/2014 - 20:16
A recent decision from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals gives occasion to review the finality rule and its three exceptions. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in In re Donald J. Donovan, 532 F. 3rd 1134 (11th Cir. 2008) dealt with an appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's denial of an unsecured creditor's motion to dismiss a chapter 7 case as being "abusive".