Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/31/2018 - 17:13
In Tepper v. Amos Financial, LLC, No. 17-2851 (3d Cir. August 7, 2018), the court distinguished the Supreme Court’s restrictive decision in Henson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., and held that the defendant, a company whose principal business is the acquisition and collection of debts is a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Read More
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 08/30/2018 - 20:28
The automatic stay of Bankruptcy Code section 362(a)(1) prohibits: “The commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action of proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the Read More
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/26/2017 - 13:01
It is generally true in a New York bankruptcy case that the Chapter 7 Trustee has a “look back” period of six years prior to the bankruptcy filing to examine asset transfers and commence litigation to set aside any that are deemed to be fraudulent transfers. This is because the Bankruptcy Code allows a Chapter 7 Trustee to set aside asset transfers that would be “voidable under applicable law by a creditor holding an unsecured claim…”.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/15/2016 - 17:36
The Treasury’s Home Affordable Modification Program, known as HAMP, will sunset on December 30, 2016. HAMP, put in place early in the Great Recession, provides two separate avenues for a homeowner with a qualified mortgage dated prior to January 1, 2009 that is in default or at imminent risk of default to seek a mortgage modification subject to program guidelines.
In order to take advantage of HAMP, a complete application package must be submitted to the participating mortgage servicer handling your mortgage by December 30, 2016.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/05/2013 - 14:37
Debtors sometimes are unable to open a checking account after receiving their bankruptcy Discharge. These debtors typically had a troubled history with their bank, generally involving fraud, bounced checks or excessive overdraft activity, resulting in this negative information being reported to a check reporting company known as Chex Systems. Such negative information remains in this database service for five (5) years and is readily accessed and utilized by its members (usually financial institutions) in making decisions about who will be allowed to open a checking account, etc.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/05/2013 - 14:37
Debtors sometimes are unable to open a checking account after receiving their bankruptcy Discharge. These debtors typically had a troubled history with their bank, generally involving fraud, bounced checks or excessive overdraft activity, resulting in this negative information being reported to a check reporting company known as Chex Systems. Such negative information remains in... Read More »
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/19/2013 - 10:26
Any exploration of this topic requires an understanding of reaffirmation agreements. Under New York bankruptcy law (In re Boodrow) a debtor does not have to sign a Reaffirmation Agreement for a mortgage on real estate. This is a good thing (especially when dealing with second or third mortgages), since a signed Reaffirmation Agreement causes you to remain personally liable for the mortgage debt after bankruptcy, and for any resulting deficiency judgment determined to be due after a foreclosure of the “reaffirmed” mortgage.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/19/2013 - 10:26
Any exploration of this topic requires an understanding of reaffirmation agreements. Under New York bankruptcy law (In re Boodrow) a debtor does not have to sign a Reaffirmation Agreement for a mortgage on real estate. This is a good thing (especially when dealing with second or third mortgages), since a signed Reaffirmation Agreement causes you... Read More »
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/19/2013 - 14:52
Many clients “surrender” their house as part of their Chapter 7 bankruptcy and assume that said act will allow them to put their homeowner's “experience” totally in their rear view mirror. Unfortunately, in the context of dealing with secured debt (such as mortgages or car loans) in bankruptcy, the term “surrender”does not mean what many... Read More »
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/19/2013 - 10:31
Many clients “surrender” their house as part of their Chapter 7 bankruptcy and assume that said act will allow them to put their homeowner’s “experience” totally in their rear view mirror. Unfortunately, in the context of dealing with secured debt (such as mortgages or car loans) in bankruptcy, the term “surrender”does not mean what many people think it does.