Blogs

By STACY COWLEY and JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG

Tens of thousands of people who took out private loans to pay for college but have
not been able to keep up payments may get their debts wiped away because critical
paperwork is missing.

The troubled loans, which total at least $5 billion, are at the center of a
protracted legal dispute between the student borrowers and a group of creditors who
have aggressively pursued them in court after they fell behind on payments.

Judges have already dismissed dozens of lawsuits against former students,
essentially wiping out their debt, because documents proving who owns the loans are
missing. A review of court records by The New York Times shows that many other
collection cases are deeply flawed, with incomplete ownership records and massproduced
documentation.

Some of the problems playing out now in the $108 billion private student loan
market are reminiscent of those that arose from the subprime mortgage crisis a
decade ago, when billions of dollars in subprime mortgage loans were ruled
uncollectible by courts because of missing or fake documentation. And like those
troubled mortgages, private student loans — which come with higher interest rates
and fewer consumer protections than federal loans — are often targeted at the most
vulnerable borrowers, like those attending for-profit schools.

At the center of the storm is one of the nation’s largest owners of private student
loans, the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts. It is struggling to prove in court
that it has the legal paperwork showing ownership of its loans, which were originally
made by banks and then sold to investors. National Collegiate’s lawyers warned in a
recent legal filing, “As news of the servicing issues and the trusts’ inability to produce
the documents needed to foreclose on loans spreads, the likelihood of more defaults
rises.”

National Collegiate is an umbrella name for 15 trusts that hold 800,000 private
student loans, totaling $12 billion. More than $5 billion of that debt is in default,
according to court filings. The trusts aggressively pursue borrowers who fall behind
on their bills. Across the country, they have brought at least four new collection cases
each day, on average — more than 800 so far this year — and tens of thousands of
lawsuits in the past five years.

Last year, National Collegiate unleashed a fusillade of litigation against
Samantha Watson, a 33-year-old mother of three who graduated from Lehman
College in the Bronx in 2013 with a degree in psychology.

Ms. Watson, the first in her family to go to college, took out private loans to
finance her studies. But she said she had trouble following the fine print. “I didn’t
really understand about things like interest rates,” she said. “Everybody tells you to
go to college, get an education, and everything will be O.K. So that’s what I did.”

Ms. Watson made some payments on her loans but fell behind when her
daughter got sick and she had to quit her job as an executive assistant. She now
works as a nurse’s aide, with more flexible hours but a smaller paycheck that barely
covers her family’s expenses.

When National Collegiate sued her, the paperwork it submitted was a mess,
according to her lawyer, Kevin Thomas of the New York Legal Assistance Group. At
one point, National Collegiate presented documents saying that Ms. Watson had
enrolled at a school she never attended, Mr. Thomas said.

“I tried to be honest,” Ms. Watson said of her court appearance. “I said, ‘Some of
these loans I took out, and I’ll be responsible for them, but some I didn’t take.’”

In her defense, Ms. Watson’s lawyer seized upon what he saw as the flaws in
National Collegiate’s paperwork. Judge Eddie McShan of New York City’s Civil Court
in the Bronx agreed and dismissed four lawsuits against Ms. Watson. The trusts
“failed to establish the chain of title” on Ms. Watson’s loans, he wrote in one ruling.

When the judge’s rulings wiped out $31,000 in debt, “it was such a relief,” Ms.
Watson said. “You just feel this whole weight lifted. My mom started to cry.”

Joel Leiderman, a lawyer at Forster and Garbus, the law firm that represented
National Collegiate in its litigation against Ms. Watson, declined to comment on the
lawsuits.

Lawsuits Tossed Out

Judges throughout the country, including recently in cases in New Hampshire,
Ohio and Texas, have tossed out lawsuits by National Collegiate, ruling that it did
not prove it owned the debt on which it was trying to collect.

The trusts win many of the lawsuits they file automatically, because borrowers
often do not show up to fight. Those court victories, which can be used to garnish
paychecks and federal benefits like Social Security, can haunt borrowers for decades.

The loans that National Collegiate holds were made to college students more
than a decade ago by dozens of different banks, then bundled together by a financing
company and sold to investors through a process known as securitization. These
private loans were not guaranteed by the federal government, which is the nation’s
largest student loan lender.

But as the debt passed through many hands before landing in National
Collegiate’s trusts, critical paperwork documenting the loans’ ownership
disappeared, according to documents that have surfaced in a little-noticed legal
battle involving the trusts in state and federal courts in Delaware and Pennsylvania.
National Collegiate’s legal problems have hinged on its inability to prove it owns
the student loans, not on any falsification of documents.

Robyn Smith, a lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center, a nonprofit
advocacy group, has seen shoddy and inaccurate paperwork in dozens of cases
involving private student loans from a variety of lenders and debt buyers, which she
detailed in a 2014 report.

But National Collegiate’s problems are especially acute, she said. Over and over,
she said, the company drops lawsuits — often on the eve of a trial or deposition —
when borrowers contest them. “I question whether they actually possess the
documents necessary to show that they own loans,” Ms. Smith said.

In an unusual situation, one of the financiers behind National Collegiate’s trusts
agrees with some of the criticism. He is Donald Uderitz, the founder of Vantage
Capital Group, a private equity firm in Delray Beach, Fla., that is the beneficial
owner of National Collegiate’s trusts. (Mr. Uderitz’s company keeps whatever money
is left after the trusts’ noteholders are paid off.)

He said he was appalled by National Collegiate’s collection lawsuits and wanted
them to stop, but an internal struggle between Vantage Capital and others involved
in operating the trusts has prevented him from ordering a halt, he said.

“We don’t like what’s going on,” Mr. Uderitz said in a recent interview.

“We don’t want National Collegiate to be the poster boy of bad practices in
student loan collections, but we have no ability to affect it except through this
litigation,” he said, referring to a lawsuit that he initiated last year against the trusts’
loan servicer in Delaware’s Chancery Court, a popular battleground for corporate
legal fights.

Ballooning Balances

Like those who took on subprime mortgages, many people with private student
loans end up shouldering debt that they never earn enough to repay. Borrowing to
finance higher education is an economic decision that often pays off, but federal
student loans — a much larger market, totaling $1.3 trillion — are directly funded by
the government and come with consumer protections like income-based repayment
options.

Private loans lack that flexibility, and they often carry interest rates that can
reach double digits. Because of those steep rates, the size of the loans can quickly
balloon, leaving borrowers to pay hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of dollars
each month.

Others are left with debt for degrees they never completed, because the forprofit
colleges they enrolled in closed amid allegations of fraud. Federal student
borrowers can apply for a discharge in those circumstances, but private borrowers
cannot.

Other large student lenders, like Sallie Mae, also pursue delinquent borrowers in
court, but National Collegiate stands apart for its size and aggressiveness, borrowers’
lawyers say.

Lawsuits against borrowers who have fallen behind on their consumer loans are
typically filed in state or local courts, where records are often hard to search. This
means that there is no national tally of just how often National Collegiate’s trusts
have gone to court.

Very few cases ever make it to trial, according to court records and borrowers’
lawyers. Once borrowers are sued, most either choose to settle or ignore the
summons, which allows the trusts to obtain a default judgment.

“It’s a numbers game,” said Richard D. Gaudreau, a lawyer in New Hampshire
who has defended against several National Collegiate lawsuits. “My experience is
they try to bully you at first, and then if you’re not susceptible to that, they back off,
because they don’t really want to litigate these cases.”

Transworld Systems, a debt collector, brings most of the lawsuits for National
Collegiate against delinquent borrowers. And in legal filings, it is usually a
Transworld representative who swears to the accuracy of the records backing up the
loan. Transworld did not respond to a request for comment.

Hundreds of cases have been dismissed when borrowers challenge them,
according to lawyers, often because the trusts do not produce the paperwork needed
to proceed.

‘We Need Answers’

Jason Mason, 35, was sued over $11,243 in student loans he took out to finance
his freshman year at California State University, Dominguez Hills. His lawyer, Joe
Villaseñor of the Legal Aid Society of San Diego, got the case dismissed in 2013, after
the trust’s representative did not show up for a court-ordered deposition. It is
unclear if the trusts had the paperwork they would have needed to prove their case,
Mr. Villaseñor said.

“It was a scary time,” Mr. Mason said of being taken to court. “I didn’t know
how they would come after me, or seize whatever I had, to get the money.”

Nancy Thompson, a lawyer in Des Moines, represented students in at least 30
cases brought by National Collegiate in the past few years. All were dismissed before
trial except three. Of those, Ms. Thompson won two and lost one, according to her
records. In every case, the paperwork Transworld submitted to the court had critical
omissions or flaws, she said.

National Collegiate’s beneficial owner, Mr. Uderitz, hired a contractor in 2015 to
audit the servicing company that bills National Collegiate’s borrowers each month
and is supposed to maintain custody of many loan documents critical for collection
cases.

A random sample of nearly 400 National Collegiate loans found not a single one
had assignment paperwork documenting the chain of ownership, according to a
report they had prepared.

While Mr. Uderitz wants to collect money from students behind on their bills,
he says he wants the lawsuits against borrowers to stop, at least until he can get
more information about the documentation that underpins the loans.

“It’s fraud to try to collect on loans that you don’t own,” Mr. Uderitz said. “We
want no part of that. If it’s a loan we’re owed fairly, we want to collect. We need
answers on this.”

Keith New, a spokesman for the servicer, the Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency (known to borrowers as American Education Services), said, “We
believe that the auditors were misinformed about the scope of P.H.E.A.A.’s
contractual obligations. We are confident that the litigation will reveal that the
agency has acted properly and in accordance with its agreements.”

The legal wrangling — now playing out in three separate court cases in
Pennsylvania and Delaware — has dragged on for more than a year, with no
imminent resolution in sight. Borrowers are caught in the turmoil. Thousands of
them are unable to get answers about critical aspects of their loans because none of
the parties involved can agree on who has the authority to make decisions. Some
2,000 borrower requests for forbearance and other help have gone unanswered,
according to a court filing late last year.

Susan C. Beachy contributed research.

Copyright 2017 The New York Times Company.  All rights reserved.

New policy governing credit reporting criteria.
Credit score can make or break a consumer.
Photo by CafeCredit under CC 2.0
Starting July 1, 2017, the three nationwide consumer reporting agencies, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, are starting a new policy that will raise about 12 million consumers’ credit scores as much as 10 points.  This could mean the difference in qualifying for a better interest rate when financing a vehicle or other cost savings benefits.
The companies are instituting this new policy following a settlement with lawmakers in more than 30 states. Attorneys general alleged liens and civil judgments were often attached to the wrong people, unfairly hurting their ability to access credit for a home, car or gym membership.
After July 1st if a lien or judgment does not match three of the four criteria of name, address, social security number or birthdate, it will no longer appear on a credit report.  Many courts have specific requirements before a creditor can record a judgment (many requirements are ignored more than honored).  This new policy may bring a focus on the court requirements as related to recorded liens/judgments.

See also: Here’s one thing consumers still don’t understand about their credit scores
Increases in a consumer’s credit score can move them into a more desirable credit category which could mean qualifying for more cards and other forms of credit with lower interest rates.

• Tax liens and civil judgments will remain on credit reports as long as the citation includes the person’s name, address and either the date of birth or the Social Security number. It is anticipated that 40%-50% of tax liens will remain on credit reports.
• Because civil judgments do not generally adhere to these enhanced standards, they will be removed from consumer reports. It is estimated that only about 4% of civil judgments might remain on reports.
• Medical debt that is less than six months old will not be reported beginning Sept. 1.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau tracks consumers’ complaints, and one of the most frequent is about incorrect information on credit reports.

The bottom line – don’t take on credit unless you can pay the debt.  As a bankruptcy attorney I see the optimistic use of credit the start of a slow downhill slide into financial distress.  “Learn to use credit, rather than credit using you”.  Diane Drain

Share this entry

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on Google+
• Share on Pinterest
• Share on Linkedin
• Share on Tumblr
• Share on Reddit
• Share by Mail

About the Author:
Diane L. Drain is a well known and respected Arizona bankruptcy attorney. She is an expert in both consumer bankruptcy and Arizona foreclosure. Since 1985 she has been a dedicated advocate for her clients and spokesperson for Arizona citizens. Diane is a retired professor of law teaching bankruptcy for more than 20 years. As a teacher she believes in offering everyone, not just her clients, advice about the Arizona bankruptcy laws. She is also a mentor to hundreds of Arizona attorneys.
I would be flattered if you connected with me on GOOGLE+
*From Diane: This article/blog is available for educational purposes only and does not provide specific legal advice. By using this information, you agree there is no attorney client relationship between you and me, and that this information should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney familiar with your personal circumstances and licensed to practice law in your state.*

Related Post

.yuzo_related_post img{width:246.5px !important; height:116px !important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb{line-height:15px;background: !important;color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb:hover{background:#fcfcf4 !important; -webkit-transition: background 0.2s linear; -moz-transition: background 0.2s linear; -o-transition: background 0.2s linear; transition: background 0.2s linear;;color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb a{color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb a:hover{ color:}!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb:hover a{ color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb:hover .yuzo__text--title{ color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .yuzo_text, .yuzo_related_post .yuzo_views_post {color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb:hover .yuzo_text, .yuzo_related_post:hover .yuzo_views_post {color:!important;}
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb{ margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px; padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px; }
.yuzo_related_post .relatedthumb{}

jQuery(document).ready(function( $ ){
jQuery('.yuzo_related_post .yuzo_wraps').equalizer({ columns : '> div' });
});
The post 12 Million Consumer Credit Scores Raised July 1, 2017 appeared first on Diane L. Drain - Phoenix Bankruptcy & Foreclosure Attorney.

Wynn at Law LLC provides estate planning services – wills are one example. ‘Probate’ is a commonly used term in estate planning, especially these days when many clients have an estate worth more than $50,000. First, a bit on probate… then why $50,000 is an important number.
Probate is a court process whereby a will is legally ‘proven’ as the true last testament of the deceased. Essentially, the document is reviewed and validated. It came to be a more common process in the 16thcentury when greedy relatives (or non-relatives) began making phony claims on a dead person’s property. It comes from the same Latin roots as ‘probation.’ In probation, a person has to prove he can live within the law… in probate, a document has to be proven to be authentic and created within the law. Probation and probate have nothing else in common other than the root word, meaning proof.

 
The ruling of a probate court is the first step in resolving all claims and distributing the deceased person’s property in a will. The court officially designates an executor to carry out the will’s instructions. Usually, the executor is named already when the person made out the will. If a will is contested, it happens in probate court.
What else happens in probate?
·         Creditors must be notified and legal notices published.
·         Homes/property/other possessions may have to be sold off to pay those debts, or otherwise make distributions evenly to the beneficiaries.
·         If there is a lawsuit over the death, or the deceased was party to pending lawsuits, those are noted and settled (if possible).
·         Estate taxes, gift taxes or inheritance taxes must be considered if the estate exceeds certain thresholds. Working with an estate planner can minimize these.
Some assets, like life insurance, are not counted because they are transferred directly to the beneficiaries and avoid probate. Death benefits are not included in an estate. Living Trusts – usually created to hold large assets – also are excluded from probate. Joint tenants (e.g. husband and wife) are allowed the joint property in a ‘right of survivorship’ if one dies, and this, too, avoids probate. Bank or investment accounts designated Transfer on Death (TOD) avoid probate as well. Real Estate can also be re-titled to avoid to probate, through tools such as a Transfer on Death Deed (TODD).
Here’s where the $50,000 comes into play. For estates in Wisconsin, after all those subtractions, the small estate threshold is $50,000. If the estate is valued below that and there is a will, probate is avoided. If there is no will, or if the estate is more than $50,000, probate is required. Most probate proceedings in Wisconsin aren’t very onerous. They are informal, with no squabbles between beneficiaries and few creditors. This is little more than an application to the court, followed by a summary judgment. A more formal proceeding requires the court to help distribute assets.
Wynn at Law LLC works with clients to secure their assets in a will or trusts to hold up in probate, or avoid it all together.
*The content and material in this original post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.  
Photo by Marzky Ragma Jr., used with permission.
The post What exactly is ‘probate’? appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

I'm having trouble figuring out how to do a simple thing. Our non-profit rents out our facilities. Applicants complete google form which dumps event data into google sheet. I'm trying to merge the responses from the sheet into a google … Continue reading →
The post I’m having trouble figuring out how to do a simple thing. Our non-profit rents out our facilities. Applicants… appeared first on Vonda S. McLeod, Attorney at Law.