Blogs
Bankruptcy court decisions are normally appealed to the location's federal district court. Certain standards are used by a district court in making its decision upon appeal.
When a district court reviews the bankruptcy court's decision, the bankruptcy court's factual findings are accepted unless they are "clearly erroneous" with due regard being given to the bankruptcy court's opportunity to judge the credibility of the witness. In re Englander, 95 F.3d 1028, 1030 (11th Cir. 1996).
The bankruptcy court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo - that is afresh or anew. Mixed questions of law and fact are also reviewed de novo. In re Lentek Int'l, Inc., 346 Fed. Appx. 430, 433 (11th Cir. 2009). Under "de novo" review, the district court independently examines the law and draws its own conclusions after apply the law to the facts of the case without regard to the decision made by the bankruptcy court. In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir. 2001).(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases.
There are income qualifications for filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If you are over the median for your state then you are subject to a means test. If it is determined that you have the ability to pay back at least 25% over the next three to five years, then you will not qualify for Chapter+ Read MoreThe post Your Monthly Income Is A Factor In Qualifying For A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy appeared first on David M. Siegel.

In the case of General Lending Corp. v. Jesus Cancio, et al., Case No. 13-21030-CIV-Marra (SD Fla. 2014), the court reviewed a ruling by the Bankruptcy Court dealing with the issue of the eligibility amounts allowed for filing under chapter 13 and whether these eligibility amounts restrictions may be waived.
In an appeal to the district court from the bankruptcy court's ruling, the district court must accept the bankruptcy court's factual findings unless they are "clearly erroneous" but review the bankruptcy court's legal conclusions de novo. The bankruptcy court's findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence are not to be set aside unless "clearly erroneous" and with "due regard" given to the opportunity of the bankruptcy court to judge the "credibility of witnesses." The United States Supreme Court in U.S. v. U.Su Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948) held that a finding is "clearly erroneous" when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court upon examining the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Under de novo review, the district court "independently examines the law and draws its own conclusions after applying the law to the facts of the case, without regard to decisions made by the Bankruptcy Court." In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 224 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir. 2001). Mixed questions of law and facts are also reviewed de novo.
The District Court reviewed the bankruptcy code's provision for eligibility to be a debtor under chapter 13 as set forth in 11 USC § 109 (e) which limits chapter 13 relief to individuals with "regular income" owing secured debts of less than $1,081,400. and unsecured debts less than $360,475.00. Only "noncontingent" and "liquidated" debts are included in making this calculation. The Court noted that this eligibility determination is to be made as of the petition date. In re De La Hoz, 451 B.R. 192, 194 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011). The Court noted that normally these restrictions are "strictly construed".
The Court further noted that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet addressed the issue of whether this "eligibility" limitation is "jurisdictional" but that the majority of the courts that have addressed the issue have found this it is not jurisdictional in nature. The Court adopted the majority view of the courts that the eligibility limitations may be waived if a creditor fails to raise an objection to the debtor's eligibility in a timely manner. Rudd v. Laughlin, 866 F.2d 1040 (8th Cir. 1989).
The District Court upheld the Bankruptcy Court's ruling rejecting the creditor's argument that its objections were not barred by laches. The Court explained that laches arises after an "unreasonable and inexcusable delay." The Court noted that laches is a doctrine whereby one side's inaction and the other side's legitimate reliance may bar claims for equitable relief.
The District Court unheld the Bankruptcy Court's ruling finding no error under the applicable standards of review.
(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases.
A man behind an investment scheme meant to defraud investors was charged with two counts of bankruptcy fraud. William Marshall Wolfe, 44, of Ridgeland appeared in federal court and indicted on charges related to bankruptcy fraud following a federal investigation involving multiple government agencies. Documents related to the court indictment claim Wolfe devised a scheme […]
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a … Continue reading →
The post Sample Blog Post appeared first on Vonda S. McLeod, Attorney at Law.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a … Continue reading →
The post Sample Blog Post Two appeared first on Vonda S. McLeod, Attorney at Law.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a … Continue reading →
The post Sample Blog Post Three appeared first on Vonda S. McLeod, Attorney at Law.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a … Continue reading →
The post Sample Blog Post Four appeared first on Vonda S. McLeod, Attorney at Law.
File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy To Protect Property The first reason why somebody would want to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy is if they have something they want to protect. What I’m talking about here is something of value that is subject to a taking if a bankruptcy case is not file. This could be wages. If someone is+ Read MoreThe post There Are Three Main Reasons Why Somebody Would Want To File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy appeared first on David M. Siegel.
In many cases, you can stop a mortgage foreclosure by filing for a mortgage modification under the HAMP program. The application for a mortgage modification can be filed directly with the mortgage lender or was part of a chapter 13 bankruptcy you may file. If you are on the eve of a foreclosure sale, I would probably be best to file a chapter 13 bankruptcy in order to insure the stopping of your foreclosure sale.
If you file the modification as part of a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, the modification request will proceed under the Miami Bankruptcy Court's new "LMM" program (Loss Mitigation Mediation) which has been very successful in helping homeowners achieve a mortgage modification.
Suspension of Referral or Foreclosure or Foreclosure Sale
Immediately upon a mortgage borrower's application for consideration for a HAMP mortgage modification, a may not refer a mortgage loan for foreclosure or conduct a scheduled foreclosure sale unless
- the borrower has been evaluated for HAMP and determined to be ineligible for the program
- borrower accepts a Trial Payment Plan and fails to make current trial period payments unless
- the mortgage servicer is evaluating the borrower for a HAMP Tier 2 application until the evaluation for a HAMP Tier 2 is complete and the borrower is determind to be ineligible for HAMP Tier 2
- the borrower or co-borrower states he is not interested in pursuing a HAMP modification
- the remaining non-borrower was unable to assume the note and re-apply for HAMP during the period provided under the rule
- the Loss Mitigation Application is incomplete and i. more than 120 days has passed or ii. more than 30 days has passed since the servicer sent the borrower an "Incomplete Information Notice"
- If the borrower submits an incomplete Loss Mitigation Application the mortgage servicer if the application still remains incomplete after the later of
- a delinquency for more than four months
- 30 days has has passed since the servicer sent the borrower an "Incomplete Information Notice" and the Loss Mitigation Application still is incomplete
Suspension of Foreclosure after Referral for Mortgage Foreclosure
If the foreclosure has already been filed, the mortgage servicer must suspend the foreclosure process upon the borrower's accept of a Trial Payment Plan upon verified income and for the duration of the trial period
Suspension after Foreclosure Sale Already Set
If a borrower submits a HAMP application at least 7 business days prior to a scheduled foreclosure sale, the mortgage servicer must immediately suspend the foreclosure sale for a period of time as necessary to evaluate the borrower's HAMP application if the new application under any of the following circumstances:
- If the borrower had made at least one payment under a HAMP Tier 1 Temporary Payment plan
- unless there has been a change in circumstances
- If the borrower had defaulted under a HAMP Permanent Modification and either i. 12 months has passed since the effective date of the modification or ii. the borrower has experienced a change in circumstances
- the borrower was previously determined to be ineligible for a HAMP Tier 1 modification
(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases.
Updated daily, this blog will keep you informed on the latest bankruptcy news!
Learn more about how Bankruptcy works and what you need to know.