Blogs
Second Chance Legal Services is extremely excited to announce the hiring of Zenon Kwik as a new attorney with our firm. Zenon will be focusing his practice on Estate Planning, Loan Modifications, Debt Negotiation, and Short Sales. Zenon is a lifelong resident of Madison Heights, a graduate of Wayne State University and University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, and has been a licensed attorney since June of 2008.
With the addition of Zenon, Second Chance Legal Services is expanding our practice areas, however we are keeping true to the core beliefs of the firm. We are here to provide affordable, quality legal representation for your financial life. If you would like to schedule an appointment with Zenon to review your estate plan, please call us at (248) 629-6367.
When a business files for bankruptcy and closes its doors, it is filing a chapter 7 bankruptcy. This means that the company or corporation will no longer operate under that name and will no longer transact any business whatsoever under that name. Provided the corporation has no assets, creditors are unable to collect on their+ Read MoreThe post What Happens To Personally Guaranteed Debt In A Business Bankruptcy? appeared first on David M. Siegel.
Mortgage modification rules make it easier to combine a mortgage modification, including under HAMP with a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. Combining a HAMP mortgage modification may be beneficial to many homeowners.
The filing of a chapter 13 bankruptcy generally stays all foreclosure and collection actions by mortgage companies and other creditors. This allows a person to formulate a chapter 13 plan to reorganize their financial situation.
A typical homeowner who owes more on their home than it is valued at will propose a chapter 13 plan to avoid their second mortgage lien and categorize it with other unsecured claims, such as credit cards. The homeowner will also file a HAMP mortgage modification request if they haven't already file it. The chapter 13 plan will provide for payment of the estimated and anticipated HAMP modified mortgage payment. The chapter 13 plan provides also provides for a percentage dividend to unsecured creditors.
Filing for a HAMP modification together with a chapter 13 bankruptcy may increase the likelihood of obtaining a HAMP modification for various reasons, including the increased feasibility of making the new payment for the first mortgage, as the second mortgage is avoided and categorized as an unsecured creditor. Also, as the HAMP is being filed in the context of the chapter 13 case, it may receive more prompt review by the mortgage company.
A typical HAMP modified mortgage payment is calculated as 31% of the homeowner's gross income. The 31% amount would cover principal, interest, taxes, insurance and associations.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications
Mortgage modification rules make it easier to combine a mortgage modification, including under HAMP with a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. Combining a HAMP mortgage modification may be beneficial to many homeowners.
The filing of a chapter 13 bankruptcy generally stays all foreclosure and collection actions by mortgage companies and other creditors. This allows a person to formulate a chapter 13 plan to reorganize their financial situation.
A typical homeowner who owes more on their home than it is valued at will propose a chapter 13 plan to avoid their second mortgage lien and categorize it with other unsecured claims, such as credit cards. The homeowner will also file a HAMP mortgage modification request if they haven't already file it. The chapter 13 plan will provide for payment of the estimated and anticipated HAMP modified mortgage payment. The chapter 13 plan provides also provides for a percentage dividend to unsecured creditors.
Filing for a HAMP modification together with a chapter 13 bankruptcy may increase the likelihood of obtaining a HAMP modification for various reasons, including the increased feasibility of making the new payment for the first mortgage, as the second mortgage is avoided and categorized as an unsecured creditor. Also, as the HAMP is being filed in the context of the chapter 13 case, it may receive more prompt review by the mortgage company.
A typical HAMP modified mortgage payment is calculated as 31% of the homeowner's gross income. The 31% amount would cover principal, interest, taxes, insurance and associations.Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications (305) 891-4055
The immigration status of a property owner is a very important component of whether a property actually is entitled to a Florida homestead status. For example, homestead status was denied to property owned by
- Canadian tourists who were only in the U.S. temporarily and did not have the legal right to have the requisite intent to reside permanently in Florida.
- A Hungarian citizen who only held a multiple-entry business visa that barred him from remaining in the U.S. for more than 180 days at a time and was only granted permanent residency status on a conditional basis as his marriage to a U.S. citizen was for less than 2 years.
In a recent case though, the Third District Court of Appeals in Florida allowed the property homestead status as it found that the property owner did meet the requirements of the homestead provision of the Florida Constitution finding that he intended to make the property his family's permanent residency as his son who was a U.S. citizen resided at the property, the property owner and his were did live at the property and were legally entitled to live temporarily in the U.S., and he and his wife were in the process of applying for permanent residency status.
The Court of reversed the lower court's ruling that denied the property homestead status which would have made the property subject to the claim of a creditor. The Court of Appeal explained that the Florida courts liberally construe the constitutional homestead exemption in the interest of the family home and in favor of "those it was designed to protect." The Court also noted that the Florida Supreme Court does not even require a property owner to reside at the property for it to have homestead statuts, but that it was sufficient that the property owner's family resides at the property and that the property owner intended to make the property his family's permanent residence.
(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications
Atty. Jordan E. Bublick - 1221 Brickell Ave., 9th Fl., Miami, Florida
The immigration status of a property owner is a very important component of whether a property actually is entitled to a Florida homestead status. For example, homestead status was denied to property owned by
- Canadian tourists who were only in the U.S. temporarily and did not have the legal right to have the requisite intent to reside permanently in Florida.
- A Hungarian citizen who only held a multiple-entry business visa that barred him from remaining in the U.S. for more than 180 days at a time and was only granted permanent residency status on a conditional basis as his marriage to a U.S. citizen was for less than 2 years.
In a recent case though, the Third District Court of Appeals in Florida allowed the property homestead status as it found that the property owner did meet the requirements of the homestead provision of the Florida Constitution finding that he intended to make the property his family's permanent residency as his son who was a U.S. citizen resided at the property, the property owner and his were did live at the property and were legally entitled to live temporarily in the U.S., and he and his wife were in the process of applying for permanent residency status.
The Court of reversed the lower court's ruling that denied the property homestead status which would have made the property subject to the claim of a creditor. The Court of Appeal explained that the Florida courts liberally construe the constitutional homestead exemption in the interest of the family home and in favor of "those it was designed to protect." The Court also noted that the Florida Supreme Court does not even require a property owner to reside at the property for it to have homestead statuts, but that it was sufficient that the property owner's family resides at the property and that the property owner intended to make the property his family's permanent residence.
Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications (305) 891-4055
Annuities issued to citizens or residents of Florida are generally exempt from the creditors of the beneficiary of the annuity. Florida Statute section 222.14 provides that "the proceeds of annuity contracts issued to citizens or residents of the state, upon whatever form, shall not in any case be liable to attachment, garnishment or legal process in favor of any creditor ... of the person who is the beneficiary of such annuity contract, unless the ... annuity contract was effected for the benefit of such creditor.
Although the application of this exemption would seem to be straightforward, it has presented may questions to courts over the years, such as:
- what constitutes an "annuity"
- what is a "beneficiary"
A recent case dealt with the question of whether an ex-wife was a "beneficiary" of an annuity. Connor v. Seaside National Bank, 2014 WL 1245340 (5th DCA 2014). In this case the annuities were purchased by a former husband and were distributed to the ex-wife in the final judgment of the dissolution of marriage. During the process while the annuities were being transferred into the ex-wife's name, a creditor obtained a judgment against her and served a writ of garnishment on the annuity company. The ex-wife asserted that the the annuities were exempt under the provisions of section 222.14.
The lower court held that the annuity contract were not exempt as the ex-wife was not yet the named annuitant and was not the "beneficiary" of the proceeds of the annuity contracts. The Court of Appeals revered this decision and held that the annuity contracts were exempt under section 222.14.
The Court of Appeals explained that the term "beneficiary" is not defined in the statute and determined the meaning of the term "beneficiary" based on its ordinary meaning which is found to be a "party who will benefit from a transfer of property or other arrangement." The Court found that the ex-wife was a "beneficiary" as she was entitled to payment of the proceeds of the annuities in accordance with the divorce judgment. (305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications
Annuities issued to citizens or residents of Florida are generally exempt from the creditors of the beneficiary of the annuity. Florida Statute section 222.14 provides that "the proceeds of annuity contracts issued to citizens or residents of the state, upon whatever form, shall not in any case be liable to attachment, garnishment or legal process in favor of any creditor ... of the person who is the beneficiary of such annuity contract, unless the ... annuity contract was effected for the benefit of such creditor.
Some questions in the application of this statute arise, such as what t constitutes an "annuity" and what is a "beneficiary".
A recent case dealt with a situation where annuities were awarded to the ex-wife as part of a final judgment of divorce. Connor v. Seaside National Bank, 2014 WL 1245340 (5th DCA 2014). The question presented was whether the ex-wife was a "beneficiary" of the annuity contract and therefore exempt. While the annuities were in the process of being transferred to her, one of her creditors served a writ of garnishment on the annuity company. The Florida Court of Appeals found that the annuities were exempt under section 222.14 as it found her to be the "beneficiaries" of the annuity contracts even though they were still in the process of being transferred into her name. The Court noted that the statute did not define the term "beneficiary" and therefore looked to the term's ordinary meaning, which it found to be a "party who will benefit from a transfer of property or other arrangement." The Court found that the ex-wife was a "beneficiary" as she was entitled to payment of the proceeds of the annuities in accordance with the divorce judgment. Jordan E. Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications (305) 891-4055
Everyone typically wants to know how long a bankruptcy case is going to take from start to finish. There is so much uncertainty about the process and about what a client must do to make it work. The transcript from the Video below outlines some of the keys points regarding timing. Please keep in mind+ Read MoreThe post What Happens Immediately After A Bankruptcy Case Is Filed? appeared first on David M. Siegel.

Right now, filing bankruptcy does little to alleviate the burden of Student Loan debt, aside for temporarily deferring monthly payment requirements. Student loan debt is preventing young people from buying homes because they cannot afford to make student loan payments and mortgage payments.
Here is some potential relief to those who now owe student loans with a high rate of interest:
U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) joined U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) today introducing the Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act, which would allow those with outstanding student loan debt to refinance at the lower interest rates currently offered to new borrowers. Durbin, Warren, and Reed have been working together on efforts to build broad support in the Senate for legislative action to reduce new student loan debt and make it easier for millions of working families to manage the student loan debt they already have.
Many borrowers with outstanding student loans have interest rates of nearly 7 percent or higher for under U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) joined U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) today introducing the Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act, which would allow those with outstanding student loan debt to refinance at the lower interest rates currently offered to new borrowers. Durbin, Warren, and Reed have been working together on efforts to build broad support in the Senate for legislative action to reduce new student loan debt and make it easier for millions of working families to manage the student loan debt they already have.
For the rest of the article, please click:
If you are interested in lowering student loan interest rate, please contact your Senator as this looks like a good bill that should become law.
Attorney Ken Jorgensen is located in Clovis, California. He handles personal, property and business disputes, including bankruptcy and eviction cases in California. You can find out more about Ken on Facebook, or at his websites, www.fresnolawgroup.com and www.fresnobankruptcylawgroup.com. He can be reached at [email protected] or by telephone at 1-559-324-1882.
Photo Credit: donkeyhotey at Flickr
Updated daily, this blog will keep you informed on the latest bankruptcy news!
Learn more about how Bankruptcy works and what you need to know.